New York Times Vs. U.S. (1971)

New York Times vs. U.S. (1971)

This case came at a time when America was at unrest. A
controversial war had divided the country. Opinions and arguments
about whether the US involvement in Vietnam was warranted occupied the
minds of American citizens. The people were hungry for information
regarding the war. The Pentagon Papers, somehow leaked to the New York
Times and Washington Post, fulfilled this need of the people for
information. The government's assumption of prior restraint seemed to
be a major blow to free speech and a sharp addition to the power of
the government. The appellate courts' indecisiveness brought the
ultimate decision to the Supreme Court. There was a deep division of
opinion even among the Justices, and their decision landmarked what
had been previously uncharted waters. The background to this landmark
case has at its roots U.S. policies in Southeast Asia. These policies,
which eventually led to the Vietnam War, were sharply criticized in a
study authorized by Secretary of State Robert S. McNamara in 1967.
This 47-volume study, officially named History of United States
Decision-Making Process on Viet Nam Policy, have come to be known as
the Pentagon Papers. These papers detailed the entire history of our
involvement in Vietnam from World War II to the beginning of the Paris
peace talks. Daniel Ellsberg, an employee of a California think tank,
was given access to this study. This think tank held Defense
Department contracts t...

New York Times Vs. U.S. (1971)

Login

Join